On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Armin Rigo <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 06:18:13PM +0100, Antonio Cuni wrote: >> I agree that at this point in time we cannot or don't want to make >> annotation/rtyping/backend parallelizable, but it should definitely be >> possible to just pass the -j flag to 'make' in an automatic way. > > Of course, that is full of open problems too. The main one is that each > gcc process consumes potentially a lot of RAM, so just passing "-j" is > not a great idea, as all gccs are started in parallel. It looks like > some obscure tweak is needed, like setting -j to a number that depends > not only on the number of CPUs (as is classically done) but also on the > total RAM of the system... > > > A bientot, > > Armin.
I guess the original idea was to have a translation option that is passed as -j flag to make, so one can specify what number of jobs he wants, instead of trying to guess it automatically. Cheers, fijal _______________________________________________ [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
