Why? I think we do support that.
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 8:31 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Author: jandem > Date: Sat Apr 10 16:31:22 2010 > New Revision: 73627 > > Modified: > pypy/branch/cpython-extension/pypy/module/cpyext/include/pymem.h > Log: > Comment out PyObject_REALLOC > > > Modified: pypy/branch/cpython-extension/pypy/module/cpyext/include/pymem.h > ============================================================================== > --- pypy/branch/cpython-extension/pypy/module/cpyext/include/pymem.h > (original) > +++ pypy/branch/cpython-extension/pypy/module/cpyext/include/pymem.h Sat > Apr 10 16:31:22 2010 > @@ -7,7 +7,8 @@ > > /* XXX use obmalloc like cpython and pypy do, otherwise we might get > segfaults */ > #define PyObject_MALLOC PyMem_MALLOC > -#define PyObject_REALLOC PyMem_REALLOC > +// we won't support this > +// #define PyObject_REALLOC PyMem_REALLOC > #define PyObject_FREE PyMem_FREE > > #define PyMem_Malloc PyMem_MALLOC > _______________________________________________ > pypy-svn mailing list > [email protected] > http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-svn > _______________________________________________ [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
