On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 7:34 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski <fij...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Ian Ozsvald <i...@ianozsvald.com> wrote: >> Cool :-) Thanks Antonio. I'd left a note to myself in the report >> because I figured expanding the math to the primitive operations might >> help PyPy (seeing as it helped Cython and ShedSkin too). I'll redo the >> timings and add them to the v0.2 report (probably in two weeks time - >> I'm waiting for feedback from several people). >> >> I've already tried a trunk version of PyPy and it was faster than >> PyPy, I'll take whichever build is the most recent and replace PyPy1.5 >> for the next updates to the report. If there is a trick to e.g. >> re-ordering the operations so it runs faster in PyPy, I'd be happy to >> accept a modification. >> > > You can also use numpy arrays (or array from array module) on PyPy to > get even more speedups. It's annoying because as of now pypy doesn't > support much of numpy (1D float arrays only with ops please :) but > it's a good start >
"During 2011 at least it looks as though numpy integration will not happen." I personally challenge this statement :) _______________________________________________ pypy-dev mailing list pypy-dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
