On 7/15/2011 2:31 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:

I know, this is kind of hand-waving what has to be done, I would
probably start with having two interpreters in one executable,
probably by having two object spaces.

Cheers,
fijal

And if I may ask, what are you trying to achieve?


Two (or more) interpreters in one executable. :)

I was recently pondering the recent announcement by Armin that he thinks STM is the way to kill the GIL. I don't think the problem is the GIL; I think the problem is that we have only one.

I think that a better (read: closer term, and more likely to be performant) answer is to create multiple interpreters, *each with their own GIL, each in their own thread,* and connect them via channels (essentially a pair of queues).

I already knew about multiple object spaces and PyPy's sandboxing; I thought this would be the easiest way to play with that idea.

Note that this is not Erlang-style processes - this is closer to appdomains (from .net), although the communications is inspired by Erlang+Go.


_______________________________________________
pypy-dev mailing list
pypy-dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev

Reply via email to