Hi Anto,

On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Antonio Cuni <anto.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Also, we have a speedup of ~2-2.5x which is more or less what you would expect
> by "just" removing the interpretation overhead. It probably indicates that we
> have laaaarge room for improvements, but I suppose that we already knew that 
> :-)

No, I would argue that it's already 2x better than "just" removing the
interpretation overhead, because PyPy-no-jit is up to 2x slower than
CPython to start with :-)


Armin
_______________________________________________
pypy-dev mailing list
pypy-dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev

Reply via email to