On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 3:00 AM, Carl Friedrich Bolz <cfb...@gmx.de> wrote:
> On 08/02/2011 11:41 AM, Armin Rigo wrote: > >> Hi Carl, >> >> On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Carl Friedrich Bolz<cfb...@gmx.de> >> wrote: >> >>> I don't have much time for things, about to leave on vacation. Just so >>> that it doesn't get lost: on the unrolling-if branch, if you use the >>> decorator, the JIT should *not* look inside the function if the >>> condition if false. even if the function doesn't contain a loop. so >>> maybe the decorators should be renamed to unroll_iff (too >>> mathematical?) or unroll_exactly_if. >>> >> >> Then it has nothing to do with unrolling: it should be renamed to >> something like "look_inside_if". It just happens to mean, as a >> side-effect, "if the condition is true, then look inside even in case >> there is a loop, thus unrolling it". >> > > look_inside_iff then? :-) > > Carl Friedrich > > ______________________________**_________________ > pypy-dev mailing list > pypy-dev@python.org > http://mail.python.org/**mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev<http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev> > Any of the above are fine with me :), I'll rename it when I next work on it. Alex -- "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." -- Evelyn Beatrice Hall (summarizing Voltaire) "The people's good is the highest law." -- Cicero
_______________________________________________ pypy-dev mailing list pypy-dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
