On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 1:06 AM, Antonio Cuni <anto.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 03/08/11 02:16, alex_gaynor wrote: > >> Author: Alex Gaynor<alex.gay...@gmail.com> >> Branch: unroll-if-alt >> Changeset: r46219:524483d98407 >> Date: 2011-08-02 17:17 -0700 >> http://bitbucket.org/pypy/**pypy/changeset/524483d98407/<http://bitbucket.org/pypy/pypy/changeset/524483d98407/> >> >> Log: a) Renamed @unroll_if to @look_inside_iff at carl's request b) >> Unroll Argument.unpack if one should. c) Leave a comment about a >> small level mess with keyword argumengs and the decorator >> >> diff --git a/pypy/interpreter/argument.py b/pypy/interpreter/argument.py >> --- a/pypy/interpreter/argument.py >> +++ b/pypy/interpreter/argument.py >> @@ -125,6 +125,7 @@ >> >> ### Manipulation ### >> >> + @jit.look_inside_iff(lambda self: not self._dont_jit) >> def unpack(self): # slowish >> "Return a ([w1,w2...], {'kw':w3...}) pair." >> kwds_w = {} >> @@ -245,6 +246,8 @@ >> > > I think that this should have a test_pypy_c test. > > ciao, > Anto > ______________________________**_________________ > pypy-dev mailing list > pypy-dev@python.org > http://mail.python.org/**mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev<http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev> > Probably, or I can revert it. Currently in pyjitpl a call wipes all heap caches in the frontend, so I wanted to remove that call so that something would be properly constant early enough, unfortunately I forgot creating a dict is a call of it's own, so it doesn't do anything useful ATM. Alex -- "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." -- Evelyn Beatrice Hall (summarizing Voltaire) "The people's good is the highest law." -- Cicero
_______________________________________________ pypy-dev mailing list pypy-dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
