On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Armin Rigo <ar...@tunes.org> wrote: > Hi Maciej, > > On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski <fij...@gmail.com> wrote: >> So while I agree that ideally, JIT could handle whatever it has, but >> maybe json is an example good enough to warrant changes. > > Yes, I agree in theory. (Didn't look in detail at the proposed > patches.) Alternatively, couldn't the patches be formulated as a new > file lib_pypy/_json.py? The stdlib's json module imports _json if > available, and of course it doesn't have to be written in RPython, it > can just be a tweaked version of the Python library. > > > A bientôt, > > Armin. >
I agree that's a neat escape from "we don't modify standard library" policy :) Cheers, fijal _______________________________________________ pypy-dev mailing list pypy-dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
