On 09/27/2011 05:03 PM, Andrew Francis wrote:
>Sounds like a good idea to me. As long as any new or altered features
>do not make it into what is labelled as an implementation of the
>Stackless API without also being accepted into Stackless itself.
Richard, in the long run, people will use whatever solves their problems
and creates opportunities. I don't know about you but I'm interested in
using PyPy and stackless.py to prototype new concurrency constructs that
I want to use.... and in the process, throwing the prototypes out there
to see what sticks.
Throwing a prototype out is not the same as giving the prototype a
semi-official blessing by packaging it with PyPy in the stackless
module. I agree with Richard.
Carl Friedrich
_______________________________________________
pypy-dev mailing list
pypy-dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
