> > I think the original topic of this discussion is numpy, not scipy. > The answer is that I don't know. I am sure that people will > reimplement whatever module is needed, or design a generic but slower > way to interface with C a la cpyext, or write a different C API, or > rely on Cython versions of their libraries and have Cython support in > PyPy... or more likely all of these approaches and more. >
Great discussion... Any idea how "micro" the micronumpy implementation will be? Numpy includes matrix multiplication, eigenvalue decomposition, histogramming, etc. For all the people meaning Scipy when they get excited for a Numpy implementation, their feature of choice may be included in Numpy after all.
_______________________________________________ pypy-dev mailing list pypy-dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
