Hi, Just to let you know I just uploaded the new release to the official PPA, so if you use Ubuntu you can install PyPy 1.7 using https://launchpad.net/~pypy/+archive/ppa
Tests and feedback are welcome :-) Thanks, Bruno On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 7:36 AM, Phyo Arkar <[email protected]>wrote: > I understand the complication of binary release. > > i did cross reference 1.0.0 and it works (starts) pypy fine,. But i am > not sure what will happen if something that uses crypting modules. > > may be release both versions of openssl (damn , python should have have > that openssl dependancy in standard modules :( ) > > > On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Armin Rigo <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Phyo, >> >> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 09:38, Phyo Arkar <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > in my Gentoo based Sabayon they are already gone. and i believe next >> latest >> > Ubuntu may use 1.0.0 too. >> >> The point is of course that doing binary releases on Linux is always a >> bit of a problem, unless we ship everything as included static >> libraries, which is a bit nonsensical IMHO for a project like PyPy. >> >> Moreover, if openssl 1.0.0 is binary compatible with openssl 0.9.8, >> then I might rather put the blame on the openssl project for releasing >> two binary compatible versions with a different (un-cross-linkable) >> first number. But I will not do so: I guess that they are not >> supposed to be totally binary compatible, and there are subtle >> differences. >> >> Is there anyone that can (1) make sure the differences don't matter, >> possibly by looking at how the CPython source evolved; and (2) maybe >> come up with a way to say "link against openssl either 0.9.8 or 1.0.0" >> in the binary? >> >> >> A bientôt, >> >> Armin. >> > > > _______________________________________________ > pypy-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev > >
_______________________________________________ pypy-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
