Hi, On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 17:57, Martijn Faassen <[email protected]> wrote: > Oh, I was assuming that PyPy would have one branch supporting both > python 2 and python 3. Is that currently not the case? What are the > reasons behind not separating the two implementations in different > packages?
I think it was not deeply thought out, but was just the simplest route to take. It does give us (mostly for free) a feature that is completely essential to have: continuously merging the "default" changes in "py3k". Otherwise it would be a mess that would end up with py3k not including all the more recent Python fixes and performance improvements we keep doing. A bientôt, Armin. _______________________________________________ pypy-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
