Hi Andrew, On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 20:29, Andrew Francis <[email protected]> wrote: > I interpret this as telling the underlying transaction manager that every > variable the thread uses is a part of a transaction, therefore log it
If you're comparing it with STM as used by Haskell, then it's a bit different. You had better compare it with the new "__transaction" keyword of GCC 4.7, for programs written in C. > Yes I am reading the other email messages. However I feel commenting on > existing work belongs in its own separate thread. Existing work might become irrelevant or change in random ways, so for now at least I feel like it's a bit of a waste of time... A bientôt, Armin. _______________________________________________ pypy-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
