On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 12:42 AM, Dale Hubler <dhub...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > Hello, > > I was requested to install pypy but our computers appear to be too new to > run it, having libssl.so.0.9.8e among other newer items. This confuses me > because the web page for pypy shows a 2011 date and blog entries from 2012. > Can 2005 SSL really be a requirement, I am unable to install such an old > item on a cluster where this software might be used. > > I looked at the pypy site but cannot find any supported platforms, install > guide, etc. I am trying this on RedHat EL 5. I tried the binary release, > but it also had the same error, no libssl.so.0.9.8, which is true, my > systems are updated. I must be missing something. Do you have any links > or other on-line info explaining how to build pypy. > thanks, > Dale > > -- > Dale Hubler dhub...@uw.edu (206) 685-4035 > Senior Computer Specialist University of Washington Genome Sciences Dept. > > _______________________________________________ > pypy-dev mailing list > pypy-dev@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
It's not PyPy requirement, it's the binary requirement. To be honest, binary distribution on linux is a major mess. Fortunately for most popular distributions there is a better or worse source of official or semi-official way to get it directly from the distribution and that;'s a recommended way (fedora, ubuntu, debian, gentoo and arch package pypy). _______________________________________________ pypy-dev mailing list pypy-dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
