On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Antonio Cuni <anto.c...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 02/14/2012 10:41 AM, Amaury Forgeot d'Arc wrote: >> >> >> Seriously - we control the code on both sides. I think the >> possibilities >> are endless. >> >> >> Why only think in terms of C code then? The best API pypy offers so far >> is written in RPython - space operations, type definitions, and external C >> calls. >> >> The "only" missing part is to allow this in a separately compiled module. > > > yes, I agree with amaury. My proposal was just "a dirty hack" to make things > working in the short term. > > In the long run, I think that the best for pypy would be either an rpython > backend or the python+ctypes backend which Romain began. Or, possibly, a > python+_ffi backend in case ctypes is too slow (and once _ffi is powerful > enough to substitute ctypes entirely). > > ciao, > Anto
The thing is noone seriously works on the cython's pypy backend, so the dirty hacks seem like a very good solution short-to-mid term. _______________________________________________ pypy-dev mailing list pypy-dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
