> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 7:47 AM, Roberto De Ioris <robe...@unbit.it> wrote: >> >>> >>>> Hello Roberto, >>>> >>>> If you need help with code or testing I would be glad in help. >>>> >>>> Is this work available in some repository? >>>> >>>> cheers >>>> Felipe >>> >>> Hi, i have started committing here: >>> >>> https://bitbucket.org/pypy/pypy >> >> Sorry, i mean >> >> https://bitbucket.org/unbit/pypy >> >> ;) >> >> >>> >>> The current Py_Initialize() implementation is very skeletal. It should >>> get >>> some of the bin/py.py (included importing site.py) in the next few >>> hours. >>> -- >>> Roberto De Ioris >>> http://unbit.it >>> >> >> >> -- >> Roberto De Ioris >> http://unbit.it >> _______________________________________________ >> pypy-dev mailing list >> pypy-dev@python.org >> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev > > Hi > > Isn't Py_Initialize clashing name with stuff exported from cpyext? Can > it be named PyPy_Initialize or something? >
Py_Initialize() is only used for app embedding python. It is not usable (or used) in c extensions. For me there is no problem in renaming it, but i suppose bigger apps (like blender) would prefer avoiding #ifdef's :) -- Roberto De Ioris http://unbit.it _______________________________________________ pypy-dev mailing list pypy-dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
