Hi Laura, A note on my two previous messages: in the first one I argued about @breakable, while the second one I suggested to use threads and "with atomic". The relationship between the two is: in the first model you would put @breakable on some outer functions until it calls things that are supposed to be atomic; in the second model you would identify the call in question and put "with atomic" there. I would personally prefer @breakable because it forces the "atomic by default" idea a bit further, but I fear that the second model is better because it is fully compatible with existing programs. Moreover, as I argue repeatedly, regular apps should use neither, and only library implementors should have to worry.
A bientôt, Armin. _______________________________________________ pypy-dev mailing list pypy-dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
