Hi Eric, On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 9:06 PM, Eric Snow <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm looking for feedback on PEP 421: "Adding sys.implementation".
I will leave others to comment on that. For myself, I can only say that it looks like a good idea, which we will happily adhere to when we migrate to Python 3.3. Maybe others have more precise ideas than I do, but I'm fine with whatever details. The reason for that: getting details "right" might be similar to the sys module's documentation, which has grown a number of "CPython implementation detail" boxes --- which are rather meaningless for PyPy, in the sense that the set of functions that are dubbed "CPython implementation detail" and the set of functions that PyPy cannot reasonably implement have little to do with each other. So I'm only vaguely +1 on "sys.implementation", because what is actually an "implementation detail" and what is not might not be completely clear, even considering the four different implementations so far. I like the part of the PEP that tries to limit what is in there, instead of adding tons of stuff. A bientôt, Armin. _______________________________________________ pypy-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
