On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Makoto Kuwata <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 9:35 PM, Alex Gaynor <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > If this is a template engine there's no reason you have to implement > scope > > using python's scope directly, both Django, Jinja, and others implement a > > different scoping system on top of Pythons. > > > > Of course it is possible, and that is one of the reason why other > template engines > (such as Django or Jinja2) are very fat and slower than my Tenjin. > There are some approaches to implement template engine. > My approach is different from Djang or Jinja2. It's that easy. > I seriously have to say [citation needed]. Do you have benchmark figures? I'm especially interested in jinja2 and spitfire (spitfire is quite fast). > > I must say again: I agree to PyPy dev team's decision and I'll try other > approach to make my product faster on PyPy as well as CPython. > I don't have any intention to blame PyPy. It's awesome software. > > -- > regards, > makoto kuwata > _______________________________________________ > pypy-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev >
_______________________________________________ pypy-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
