Hi Wim, On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 1:53 AM, <wlavrij...@lbl.gov> wrote: > Overall, I'm happy enough with the result (I'm going to need handling of > PyObject*'s later for my own nefarious purposes).
Maybe we can motivate you to look for and fix inefficiencies in cpyext :-) As far as I know it's still fully designed for "it works and we don't care about speed". See for example https://bugs.pypy.org/issue1121 which tries to push optimizations in cpyext but with no-one really interested from the core group. But IMHO the main slow part that should be optimized (probably by being rewritten from scratch) is the correspondance between the proxy PyObject structures and the real PyPy objects, which is exactly the part that interests you too. It should be possible at least to cope with only one dict lookup instead of at least two to do the roundtrip "pypy obj -> cpyext obj -> pypy obj". A bientôt, Armin. _______________________________________________ pypy-dev mailing list pypy-dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
