This is a general problem of binary distributions on linux - they are just known not to work exceptionally well.
I guess the best options is really to build pypy yourself (although there might exist a solution to this particular problem that I'm not aware of, I've never seen it before). Answering your question, the build system was not modified according to my knowledge. On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 12:50 AM, Cameron Sparr <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm trying to run PyPy 1.9 (Was running 1.8 just fine) but get the message: > > /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.7' not found (required by ./pypy) > > I tried downloading and building lib C version 2.7 but this causes a host > of other problems on my system. Was moving to Lib C 2.7 just a difference > in the development machine being used to build the PyPy binary? Any > possibility of finding a PyPy 1.9 version that does not require GLIBC_2.7 > (not sure what exact version was required by PyPy 1.8) > > Best, > Cameron > > > -- > Cameron Sparr > SIParCS Intern > NCAR \ CISL \ User Services Section (USS) > phone: 303-497-2443 > mobile: 503-327-5964 > email: [email protected] > > ______________________________**_________________ > pypy-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.python.org/**mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev<http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev> >
_______________________________________________ pypy-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
