On 06/13/2012 01:20 PM, Armin Rigo wrote:
Hi Ronny,
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Ronny Pfannschmidt
<ronny.pfannschm...@gmx.de> wrote:
We would appreciate a unified diff or
something that can easily be feed to hg import
Sorry, I didn't mean to reject, but to put emphasis on the workflow when
the patch has a more convient form for our scm its much more easy to
work with and to attribute it.
I think we should encourage contributors to use tools that help the core
developers/reviewers whenever possible.
-- Ronny
I don't think I would reject such a patch from these grounds; at least
it *is* a patch, easily usable with "patch", and not, say, entire
files that have been modified from some unknown revision, as we got
too.
I have checked in a slightly edited version of
http://www.tux.org/~mayer/cygwin/pypy/pypy-pypy-ac392fb76904.patch (hg
revision c7dff5469611). Please tell me if I missed something.
A bientôt,
Armin.
_______________________________________________
pypy-dev mailing list
pypy-dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
