On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 12:34 AM, Maciej Fijalkowski <fij...@gmail.com>wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Jan Decaluwe <j...@jandecaluwe.com>wrote: > >> For your info. >> >> Since pypy 1.6, the benchmarks for MyHDL have stagnated >> or become slightly worse (within 15%). >> >> Still, the results are much better than the average >> speedup over the pypy set of benchmarks. I guess it is >> to be expected that improvements depend heavily on >> a particular application. >> >> http://myhdl.org/doku.php/**performance?&#historical_data<http://myhdl.org/doku.php/performance?&#historical_data> >> >> Jan Decaluwe >> >> -- >> Jan Decaluwe - Resources bvba - http://www.jandecaluwe.com >> Python as a HDL: http://www.myhdl.org >> VHDL development, the modern way: http://www.sigasi.com >> World-class digital design: http://www.easics.com >> ______________________________**_________________ >> pypy-dev mailing list >> pypy-dev@python.org >> http://mail.python.org/**mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev<http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev> >> > > I would put the 15% to "noise" honestly, but well. I'm not incredibly > surprised, our optimization are more of the "a bit here a bit there" kind > these days. Maybe the next one :) > > Cheers, > fijal > Anyway, I'm pleasantly surprised about the high expectations we generate :) 1.6 was about 9 months ago and people already complain there were no significant speed improvements since then :))) Cheers, fijal
_______________________________________________ pypy-dev mailing list pypy-dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
