Armin Rigo <ar...@tunes.org> writes: > Ah, indeed. We declare most arrays as "itemtype x[1]", so gcc complains > when it can prove we do accesses at an index > 0.
Is there a good reason not to use the C99 "itemtype x[]" or even the old GCC extension "itemtype x[0]"? These won't trigger this warning, which means we could leave it on in case a legitimate case crops up. As far as I know, the only noticeable difference between [], [0], and [1] for flexible arrays is that sizeof has different semantics, but that's usually not a big deal. _______________________________________________ pypy-dev mailing list pypy-dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
