On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Antonio Cuni <anto.c...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 04/03/2013 09:27 AM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote: >> >> hello everyone >> >> I'm incredibly unhappy about the 2.7 -> 2 lib rename. It broke >> virtualenv, there is no recent virtualenv available and there is >> absolutely no good reason why we did that. I'm now spending tons of >> time trying to think how to update virtualenv to a TOT version a bit >> everywhere. >> >> I'm inclined to do a simple revert (or re-rename it) > > > +1, although to jumpy to the defence of whoever did the commit, it's not > obvious that such a change breaks virtualenv because there are not tests. > Maybe we should setup a buildbot to run virtualenv's tests with the nightly > pypy? > I didn't do that when I added virtualenv support for the simple reason that > at that time virtualenv had no tests, but maybe the situation improved > nowadays? > > ciao, > Anto > > >
In all honesty, it only breaks because virtualenv is a pile of hacks. But this is not really enough of a reason to break things. _______________________________________________ pypy-dev mailing list pypy-dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
