I think we score pretty good on this benchmark. Definitely the competition there is tough (v8, luajit are the only other dynamic lang implementations considered).
There is a plan to improve on *such* code, but definitely our immediate plans are for more python-like workloads than number crunching. Cheers, fijal On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Alex Gaynor <alex.gay...@gmail.com> wrote: > The biggest problem with this benchmark is that it uses nested lists (read: > memory indirections), whereas the other implementations (or at least the C > one) uses flat storage. > > Alex > > > On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 4:30 AM, Dimitri Vorona <alen...@googlemail.com> > wrote: >> >> Hi everyone, >> >> just wanted to bring to your attention this blog post: >> http://attractivechaos.wordpress.com/2013/04/06/performance-of-rust-and-dart-in-sudoku-solving/ >> . PyPy ist compared with various dynamic and static languages. >> >> While the perfomance is still OK (within an order of magnitude of C), it >> places last by a quite big margin. I would like to know if these result >> match your benchmarks or is the implementation of the sudoku solver >> non-optimal for pypy (can be seen here >> https://github.com/attractivechaos/plb/blob/master/sudoku/sudoku_v1.py) >> >> Regards, >> >> Dmytro Vorona. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> pypy-dev mailing list >> pypy-dev@python.org >> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev >> > > > > -- > "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to > say it." -- Evelyn Beatrice Hall (summarizing Voltaire) > "The people's good is the highest law." -- Cicero > GPG Key fingerprint: 125F 5C67 DFE9 4084 > > _______________________________________________ > pypy-dev mailing list > pypy-dev@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev > _______________________________________________ pypy-dev mailing list pypy-dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
