I agree with this, the abstraction doesn't really work well right now, there's way too much code duplication. If we seriously want to have an lltype/ootype distinction this should be redone from scratch (IMO).
Alex On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Ronny Pfannschmidt < ronny.pfannschm...@gmx.de> wrote: > Hi all, > > since there basically is no maintained ootype backend > i wonder about removing the ootype vs lltype abstraction together with > them, > > comments? > > -- Ronny > > On 05/08/2013 11:12 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote: > >> On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 9:50 PM, David >> Naylor<naylor.b.david@gmail.**com<naylor.b.da...@gmail.com>> >> wrote: >> >>> On Wednesday, 8 May 2013 13:35:00 Alex Gaynor wrote: >>> >>>> We should probably just delete it at this point, it's completely >>>> unmaintained, doesn't work, and just confuses people; if someone wants >>>> to >>>> ressurect it, hg log should be good enough. >>>> >>> >>> Isn't JVM in a similar state (although I think someone may be working on >>> it, >>> if my memory of emails on the list serves me). >>> >> >> It is >> ______________________________**_________________ >> pypy-dev mailing list >> pypy-dev@python.org >> http://mail.python.org/**mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev<http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev> >> > > ______________________________**_________________ > pypy-dev mailing list > pypy-dev@python.org > http://mail.python.org/**mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev<http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev> > -- "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." -- Evelyn Beatrice Hall (summarizing Voltaire) "The people's good is the highest law." -- Cicero GPG Key fingerprint: 125F 5C67 DFE9 4084
_______________________________________________ pypy-dev mailing list pypy-dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
