On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Antonio Cuni <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > > On 06/05/2013 07:26 AM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote: >> >> Hi anto >> >> if this is for speeding up json, call the module _json, as CPython >> does (I don't care if the API is similar or not, as long as it's used >> by json lib) > > > > yes, it is for speeding up json, but I called it differently precisely > because the API is different (basically, my _fastjson offers a drop-in > replacement for "json.loads", while cpython's _json offers only some of the > functions to implement it) > > I think it's better to name it differently because I can imagine there are > programs around which do things like "from _json import scanstring" for > their own purposes, and they would be broken by our > _json-which-is-not-really-_json module. > > What do the others think?
maybe they should stop doing that instead ;-) (note that from json import scanstring also works and in fact is preferred. from _json import scanstring would fail on pypy regardless) _______________________________________________ pypy-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
