Hi Wim, On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 6:28 PM, <wlavrij...@lbl.gov> wrote: > yes, it does. Is high on my wish list (and not just the programmer-facing > side, also the internals although there are several things that are close > but don't quite fit).
I meant specifically the way the interface is to be used by the end programmer, ignoring its implementation for now. This would mean moving to more cffi-like idioms: removing the implicit ownership-tracking logic, not guessing too hard about which overloaded function is meant to be called, and so on --- generally "explicit is better than implicit" and if the end programmer needs to expose some library in a simpler interface, he can use a Python layer on top of it (or write his own). So this would end up somewhere slightly different than where cppyy is currently. A bientôt, Armin. _______________________________________________ pypy-dev mailing list pypy-dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
