On Friday, 26 August 2011 06:37:30 Armin Rigo wrote: > Hi David, > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 9:44 PM, David Naylor <[email protected]> wrote: > > Below is the patch, and results, for my proposed hash methods for > > datetime.datetime (and easily adaptable to include tzinfo and the other > > datetime objects). I tried to make the hash safe for both 32bit and 64bit > > systems, and beyond. > > Yes, the patch looks good to me. I can definitely see how it can be a > huge improvement in performance :-) > > If you can also "fix" the other __hash__ methods in the same way, it > would be great.
To follow up on a very old email. The latest results are: # python2.7 iforkey.py ifdict: [2.110611915588379, 2.12678599357605, 2.1126320362091064] keydict: [2.1322460174560547, 2.098900079727173, 2.0998198986053467] defaultdict: [3.184070110321045, 3.2007319927215576, 3.188380002975464] # pypy2.2 iforkey.py ifdict: [0.510915994644165, 0.23750996589660645, 0.2241990566253662] keydict: [0.23270201683044434, 0.18279695510864258, 0.18002104759216309] defaultdict: [3.4535930156707764, 3.3697848320007324, 3.392897129058838] And using the latest datetime.py: pypy iforkey.py ifdict: [0.2814958095550537, 0.23425602912902832, 0.22999906539916992] keydict: [0.23637700080871582, 0.18506789207458496, 0.1831810474395752] defaultdict: [2.8174121379852295, 2.74626088142395, 2.7308008670806885] Excellent, thank you :-) Regards
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ pypy-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
