Maciej, We are not tracking history one by one. We are trying to fix test runner failures. And the current failure is a missing reference to fail_boxes_int. It is not obvious what replaced it by looking at the current sources, so we are trying to investigate back to the source of the change.
Thanks, David On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 4:49 AM, Maciej Fijalkowski <fij...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi David. > > Why are you tracking the history one by one? The fail_boxes_int etc. > is now living on a jitframe. There are direct tests for all of that, I > would suggest looking at those instead of history (so it's now called > get_int_value and accepts a jitframe) > > On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 2:55 AM, David Edelsohn <dje....@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi, David >> >> Ivan and Andre from Unicamp and I are trying to update the ppc backend >> to the current RPython internals API. >> >> We're trying to understand the removal of fail_boxes_int, etc. from >> the backends. It looks like this was done on the remove-globals-in-jit >> branch. I guess we need to adapt all of that branch and all of >> jitframe-in-heap branch to PPC. >> >> Can you help explain a little more about this patch? >> >> https://mail.python.org/pipermail/pypy-commit/2013-January/069022.html >> >> Thanks, David >> _______________________________________________ >> pypy-dev mailing list >> pypy-dev@python.org >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev _______________________________________________ pypy-dev mailing list pypy-dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
