maybe a fakeable traceback is a good idea nonetheless? (we can provide
it directly from some __pypy__ module instead of a general mechanism)

On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Antonio Cuni <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Armin,
>
>
>>
>> As you have noticed, this is an old feature not supported any more
>> since a long time (and mostly untested).  It was an experimental
>> feature that turned out not to be useful in practice.  Just using
>> regular Python, you can mostly achieve the same effects, with the
>> exception (mostly) of pretending to have an object of some built-in
>> type for built-in function calls.
>
>
> actually, jinja2 uses transparent proxy to create fictiious traceback
> chains:
> https://github.com/mitsuhiko/jinja2/blob/master/jinja2/debug.py
>
> if we decided that transparent proxies are not supported or deprecated, we
> should remove them and tell people to stop using them.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pypy-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
>
_______________________________________________
pypy-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev

Reply via email to