Hi Timothy, On 2 March 2018 at 03:22, Timothy Baldridge <tbaldri...@gmail.com> wrote: > There was some talk awhile back of using fine-grained locks in PyPy to > remove the gil. From the bitbucket repo it looks like the experiments never > made it into master. Is there any work that was done here that could be used > by other RPython interpreters, especially for interpreters that default to > immutable or share-nothing semantics?
It was done in the nogil-unsafe-2 branch, but abandoned for now. You'd have to dig in that branch and see if it can be used as a starting point for your case. Notably, there's the GC which was made resistant to multithreaded usage. As far as I remember, though, nothing was done yet on the JIT front. A bientôt, Armin. _______________________________________________ pypy-dev mailing list pypy-dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
