Hi CF, Thank you for your reply.
>> I also ran test_ll_random.py with `--repeat=20000 --random-seed=1234` >> and all test are passing. > > How long does that take, in wall clock time? I think for the other > backends we kept it running for a bunch of days after the last crash > occurred. It took only ~6 hrs (wall clock). If it takes a bunch of days on other architectures, I guess I must multiply `--repeat` by 40 times or run it on real hardware. I'll try it again after I clear other bugs. Regards, Logan On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 12:37 AM CF Bolz-Tereick via pypy-dev < pypy-dev@python.org> wrote: > On 1/29/24 09:27, CF Bolz-Tereick via pypy-dev wrote: > > This test looks just wrong, in my opinion. Given that the variable name > > is `fff`, I think it was just meant as a check "does it roughly look > > like a pointer". So I think somebody just forgot that sys.maxint is not > > a power of 2 (and then things failed on win32 and darwin and somebody > > fixed it with the extra if). You can change the test to always use > > sys.maxint*2+1. > > I went ahead and just did that change on the main branch. > > Cheers, > > CF > _______________________________________________ > pypy-dev mailing list -- pypy-dev@python.org > To unsubscribe send an email to pypy-dev-le...@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/pypy-dev.python.org/ > Member address: tzuhsiang.ch...@gmail.com >
_______________________________________________ pypy-dev mailing list -- pypy-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to pypy-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/pypy-dev.python.org/ Member address: arch...@mail-archive.com
