I think the discussion becomes very interesting with more things written about HPy, in particular by members of the C API working group.
It would really be interesting to have the points of view of HPy, PyPy and GraalPy developers. For example about things like: >> It seems to me that the HPy project demonstrated that this is technically >> doable and an attractive strategy. > As have numerous others, yes. SWIG, pybind11, Cython, nanobind, and PyO3 all > come immediately to mind. HPy hasn’t really demonstrated anything new beyond > those, apart from it being possible at a lower abstraction level. ----- Mail original ----- > De: "PIERRE AUGIER" <pierre.aug...@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr> > À: "hpy-dev" <hpy-...@python.org> > Envoyé: Vendredi 25 Avril 2025 22:35:58 > Objet: FYI: question related to HPy on discuss.python.org > FYI, I asked a question related to HPy on discuss.python.org and got > interesting > answers from CPython core devs: > > https://discuss.python.org/t/c-api-working-group-and-plan-to-get-a-python-c-api-compatible-with-alternative-python-implementations/89477 _______________________________________________ pypy-dev mailing list -- pypy-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to pypy-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/pypy-dev.python.org/ Member address: arch...@mail-archive.com
