On Wednesday 25 June 2003 20:02, Jim Bublitz wrote: > On Wednesday June 25 2003 08:21, Frederick Polgardy Jr wrote: > > On Wednesday 25 June 2003 10:09 am, Jim Bublitz wrote: > > > I responded to an earlier inquiry about PyKDE status, but > > > unfortunately failed to copy the list on that msg (KMail > > > doesn't add the list addr to the To: field automatically).
Well, it does for me, when using <A>. > > > There is something like 50 to 100 hours of work needed to > > > update PyKDE to sip 3.6 and KDE 3.1.2, including > > > testing/debugging/packaging etc. While I give PyKDE a high > > > priority, there are other things (like making a living) that > > > have slightly higher priority, and I haven't been able to > > > make the necessary time available for PyKDE. The situation > > > being what it is, at present I don't feel like I can even > > > estimate a release date. The best I can say is that I'll do > > > a release as soon as possible. > > > > No, I distinctly recall getting your message to this effect a > > few days ago. Me, too [(c) by aol user], last Saturday. > Curious - it didn't show up in my mail (they usually do), and > when I looked at the sent msg it didn't have the list address on > it - just the original poster's address. Hmm, To: =?iso-8859-1?q?J=E9r=F4me=20Martin?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, pykde mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=pykde&m=105621854504903&w=2 Just to let you know, that your messages get noticed. Making a living these days isn't that easy for us freelancers. > Jim Pete _______________________________________________ PyKDE mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mats.imk.fraunhofer.de/mailman/listinfo/pykde
