On Wednesday 25 June 2003 6:03 pm, Gerard Vermeulen wrote: > On Wed, 25 Jun 2003 09:13:21 -0400 > > "A.M. Kuchling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm wrapping a C++ library with SIP, and have a class with a virtual > > private destructor. sip reports a parse error when confronted with a > > declaration like "virtual ~GmOptions();". I can remove the "virtual" > > qualifier, but then the module fails to load, unable to find a mangled > > "_ZTI9GmOptions" symbol that I'm guessing is due to the destructor > > type being wrong. > > > > Any suggestions? Are there any virtual destructors wrapped in PyQt or > > PyKDE that I could look at as an example? > > My advice is not to wrap the virtual destructors. > > Some background: > (1) support of virtual destructors in sip is about a week old (see a > recent snapshot).
The change is actually trivial. The code that is generated has always been generated in 99% of cases that it was needed. The change made it 100% (and helped fix the memory leak when using QCustomEvent). > (2) sip derives interface classes from the wrapped classes; in this > scheme it is hard to see how sip can handle private virtual destructors > (but I am not the most qualified person to say so). That's correct - they can't be handled. Phil _______________________________________________ PyKDE mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mats.imk.fraunhofer.de/mailman/listinfo/pykde
