Now, keep in mind that I'm kind'a new on the PyQt scene. And I don't use Qt's network or db classes either, just the UI stuff. But anyways, my little code "essay" of last weekend was all essentially based on QTextEdit. Nowhere to be found on the free-QtWin install (now, installing on Win, that was a joy, as opposed to looong compiles on Linux). So I did replace it with QTextBrowser (I don't know if it was the right choice), as well as a few other edits: commented out 'QAction.setAccel()' as I recall, also I couldn't set cursors as in 3.x, and a few other annoying edits. In the end, yes I managed to make my code run, I mean, no showstoppers but still crippled. But somehow I couldn't find the nice "feeling" and look I have on Linux. I figured it's because of the 2.0 to 3.0 evolution. So it's the little things: now I remember I couldn't set icons on my Tab widgets. And I had some problems with QTables, but I forgot details.
So maybe on the 'fundamental functionality' you are right, one can live with Qt 2.0, I don't know 2.0 that well anyway to make a good opinion. But we're talking about UI here, where it's all the little things than count. Well, for me the difference seemed huge, and if I had the dow, sure I'd get me the latest Qt for Win ... provided that was my preferred platform to 'romance the snake'.
Cheers, Vio
Michael Lauer wrote:
Am Mit, 2003-07-30 um 06.34 schrieb Vio:
I don't believe you can achieve what you want. Because the available free-Qt-Win version is version 2.something (not 3.x !!), which is missing A LOT of the more interesting Qt stuff.
Where is that lot you are seeing? The major additions of Qt3 are network and database classes - both are even better handled in pure Python...
_______________________________________________ PyKDE mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mats.imk.fraunhofer.de/mailman/listinfo/pykde
