Xrange provides iterator semantics without actually creating a sequence, so it will always be faster, but the speed isn't noticeable to a human in this case.
On Wednesday 20 August 2003 02:24 pm, Christian Bird wrote: > One other thing to try would be using xrange instead of range. I'm > not sure which one is faster, but I do know that xrange is more > memory efficient. Hope that helps. > > -- Chris _______________________________________________ PyKDE mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mats.imk.fraunhofer.de/mailman/listinfo/pykde
