On Monday 17 November 2003 4:06 am, Eron Lloyd wrote: > Hello, > > For a project I'm developing I'm thinking about the need to possibly move > it to C++ one day, thus there will be the issue of portability. Currently, > PyQt strips out most of the Qt generic data structures (QArray, QDict, > QMap, etc.). Will this always be the case?
Almost certainly. > Would it hurt to have them > available? Most of these are template classes. > I remember someone mentioning needing QMap support, and that SIP > 4 would potentially support it. Is the same true for the other types? There are no plans to support template classes in SIP v4. > It's > really no major, I'm just curious. The obvious thing to do is to define a Python class which you know you can easily re-implement in C++ and use it consistently in your application. While I tend promote PyQt as a RAD tool for C++ applications, I've never heard of anybody actually doing it. After your C++ version, will you then possibly move it to assembler one day ;-) Phil _______________________________________________ PyKDE mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mats.imk.fraunhofer.de/mailman/listinfo/pykde
