My e-mails and phone calls with Trolltech addressed exactly that clause and they said it was fine even after I explained that strictly speaking it was a violation of that clause. They did say that if I exposed the Qt api in my app and made it available to the end user (aka, the qt scripting component), that would be a violation.
Greg On Thursday 22 January 2004 08:28 am, Ulrich Berning wrote: > Roberto Alsina schrieb: > >Hello, > > > >I was just wondering. If someone writes a nice, very free (as in BSD or > >public domain) app using PyQt, would it be legal if someone having a > >windows license would pack it into an installer and distribute it? > > > >I know it wouldn't break the application license, and I am expecting it > >not to break the PyQt-windows license either. > > > >If the riverbank guys approve, this would be nice :-) > > You are not allowed to distribute PyQt as dynamic loadable modules or a > Python interpreter containing PyQt as builtin modules, because this > would break the Qt commercial license. You either have to create a final > executable with Python and PyQt linked in, or distribute your > application without any PyQt components. > > > From The Qt COMMERCIAL LICENSE AGREEMENT: > > 9.(vii) Applications may not pass on functionality which in any way > makes it possible for others to create software with the Licensed Software; > > > > Ulli > > > _______________________________________________ > PyKDE mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mats.imk.fraunhofer.de/mailman/listinfo/pykde _______________________________________________ PyKDE mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mats.imk.fraunhofer.de/mailman/listinfo/pykde
