On Thursday 18 March 2004 18:43, Simon Edwards wrote: > On Thu, 18 Mar 2004 02:12 pm, Steve Simmons wrote: > > > How do people here feel about the current state of PyQt/PyKDE in > > > relation > > to > > > > KDE (the project)? Is it a real problem for people that PyQt/PyKDE > > > isn't distributed as part of KDE? or would it be enough if the distros > > > also came with PyQt/PyKDE as 'standard'? > > > > I'd prefer that PyQt/PyKDE came as a standard part of the KDE > > distribution, and agree it would both popularize and legitimize > > PyKDE. Not that PyKDE isn't legit, but it would gain some weight > > in users and developers minds if distributed w/KDE. > > > > On the flip side, this almost argues for a KDE-blessed python > > release. > > true, that makes it a bit tricky.
If you use SIP 3 then the Python version isn't relevant. If you use SIP 4 then at least Python 2.3 is required, but this is really down to the distros support rather than KDE. Phil _______________________________________________ PyKDE mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mats.imk.fraunhofer.de/mailman/listinfo/pykde
