This will be fixed in tonight's SIP4 snapshot. Phil
> I re-tested against sip-snapshot-20041121 (also rebuilt PyQt 3.13) and I > still observe the slow memory leak. With the paintCell override VM size > increased from 3000k to around 11000k in about 5 minutes. This is about > the same rate that I had observed with SIP 4.1 and PyQt 3.13, so nothing > seems to have changed between the two SIP versions. > > I also tried the latest SIP snapshot by not overriding paintCell and I did > observe a very small memory increase initially but I am not sure if I can > call it a leak. It increased from 2980k to 3032k after 5 minutes of > running and kept that value afterwards (I ran it for about half an hour). > > -Selim > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Phil Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Sunday, November 21, 2004 5:12 AM >> To: Tuvi, Selim >> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: Re: Slow memory leak when paintCell is overridden in >> QListViewItem >> >> On Saturday 20 November 2004 2:40 am, Tuvi, Selim wrote: >> > Hi, we have a module which displays some statistics in a QListView. We >> > wanted to change how the list view looked like so we subclassed the >> > QListViewItem and implemented our own paintCell method. >> > >> > When we override the paintCell method, we observe a slow memory leak. >> If >> we >> > do not override the paintCell method then the memory leak does not >> occur. >> > >> > I am attaching a standalone version of the module that you can test. >> > >> > We are running under Windows XP, PyQt 3.13, SIP 4.1, Qt 3.3.3 and >> Python >> > 2.3.4 all compiled with Visual Studio .NET 2003. >> > >> > The memory leak can be observed under the task manager, Processes tab, >> > under the VM Size column. >> > >> > I haven't verified yet if this is a problem with Qt or PyQt or maybe >> it >> is >> > my code. >> >> With SIP v4.0.1 I saw a very slow leak with your "working" code and a >> not >> so >> very slow leak with your "broken" code. >> >> With the current SIP snapshot I saw a very slow leak with both versions. >> Subjectively I think the leak was slower than with v4.0.1. >> >> I'll continue looking, but if you can try the snapshot I'd be interested >> to >> know if you think it improved. >> >> Phil > > _______________________________________________ PyKDE mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mats.imk.fraunhofer.de/mailman/listinfo/pykde
