Phil,
I am sorry: my code generator is fooling me (it does not generate
all pure virtual member functions).
Gerard
On Sat, 30 Apr 2005 10:49:01 +0100
Phil Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 29 April 2005 5:04 am, Gerard Vermeulen wrote:
> > Phil,
> >
> > (1) /Abstract/ and protected pure virtual member functions. SIP does not
> > recognize a C++ class as abstract which is abstract only because of a
> > **protected** pure virtual member function. I still need to use the
> > /Abstract/ annotation.
>
> Which version of SIP? The following...
>
> %Module t
>
> class Foo
> {
> protected:
> virtual void bar() = 0;
> };
>
> ...seems to do the right thing with the current snapshot.
>
> > There is a typo in the docs for Abstract:
> > "This boolean annotation is used specify .." must become
> > ".. used to specify .."
>
> Fixed.
>
> > (2) siplib's "list index out of range" is rather specific as exception text:
> > >>> import coin3d
> > >>> print coin3d.SbVec2s()[2]
> >
> > Traceback (most recent call last):
> > File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
> > IndexError: list index out of range
> >
> >
> > My first reaction was: "what list?". I am getting used to it, but
> > "index out of range" is more general.
>
> I've changed it to "sequence index out of range".
>
> Thanks,
> Phil
>
_______________________________________________
PyKDE mailing list [email protected]
http://mats.imk.fraunhofer.de/mailman/listinfo/pykde
