Simon Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I'm not saying it happens often. I'm saying that we the proposed change it >> would be *impossible* to do it. On the other hand, with the current >> interface it is possible to do exactly what you want, it is just a little >> less convenient for the common case. > > What I am saying is how cares if it impossible to do, performance is not an > issue here.
You don't care, I care. Don't do the mistake of thinking that your needs are the same of everyone else. > Making the common case work easily, bug free and as expected, is > about a million times more important. Even right now, the common case works bug free and just as expected. Your expectations are different from mine, but that does not change a thing. I know Qt uses QString and I know PyQt objects accepts and returns QString. There is nothing unexcepted in this. We're just speaking of adding an implicit conversion in the bindings of a language for which "explicit is better than implicit" is a motto. I'm just saying that we should think twice about it. -- Giovanni Bajo _______________________________________________ PyKDE mailing list [email protected] http://mats.imk.fraunhofer.de/mailman/listinfo/pykde
