On 10/21/05, Gilbert Ramirez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For me, one of the strong points of Qt is that the documentation for > it is great. Although the documention is for C++, it's still a handy > reference for PyQT programmers because the mapping from Qt/C++ to PyQt > is almost always straightforward. I'd like to keep the > non-straight-forward mappings in the documentation to a minimum, > because no one is going to do as good of a job as writing > documentation for an API that is very different from Qt's.
What raises another point: PyQT should include docstrings! Phil, have you considered this? -- Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri --------------------------------------- Computer Engineer 2001 - UNICAMP GPSL - Grupo Pro Software Livre Cell..: +55 (19) 9165 8010 Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ#: 17249123 MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Skype: gsbarbieri GPG: 0xB640E1A2 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net _______________________________________________ PyKDE mailing list [email protected] http://mats.imk.fraunhofer.de/mailman/listinfo/pykde
