Phil Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (In fact I don't see why Qt still needs SIGNAL() and SLOT() - maybe > the speed penalty of the alternative is more an issue at the C++ > level.)
Nah. There's boost::signal, which is a full-blown signal/slot implementation which works totally at compile time and has zero overhead. In fact, there is technically *nothing* that moc does which cannot be done with C++ and some advanced tecniques. But Trolltech seems to like the separate compilation step more than templates. > So, what so you think? Is dropping them to much of a cultural change? > (Of course they could also be made optional.) I'm fine with dropping them as long as they're optional. Giovanni Bajo _______________________________________________ PyKDE mailing list [email protected] http://mats.imk.fraunhofer.de/mailman/listinfo/pykde
