I'd cast my vote in favor of a wrapper. I think we already brought up
the idea when discussing the Qt namespace issue.
It does not have to be just a wrapper. I could be a small framework, complementing and modifying the original PyQt.
For example: those "setEnabled()"/"isEnabled()" to just "enabled" property could be done like this:
>>> QWidget.__get_enabled = QWidget.isEnabled
>>> QWidget.__set_enabled = QWidget.setEnabled
>>> QWidget.enabled = property(QWidget.__get_enabled, QWidget.__set_enabled)
But I still think that if we could do that QtDesigner integration (and first, the new Signal/Slot/Property meta-object registry) is much more important than any other "pythonicity" :)
Eric Jardim
_______________________________________________ PyKDE mailing list [email protected] http://mats.imk.fraunhofer.de/mailman/listinfo/pykde
