On 22.04.06 09:00:00, Adam Tenderholt wrote:
> > Did you try to compile PyQt statically too? Did you explicitly specify
> > the type of Qt lib (i.e. python configure.py -y qt)?
> 
> I think I did, but then I realized that compiling it statically was
> for when you what to compile it directly into the python interpreter.

Not into the python interpreter, but I think PyQt is linked statically
to Qt in that case, i.e. the full Qt lib is included in the .so's for
PyQt. I think this is needed when you have a statically linked Qt, but I
might be wrong on that (not a library guru).

> Perhaps I'm mistaken? I also didn't explicitly specify the type of Qt
> lib because it seemed to pick up the correct version.

If qmake is in the path or QTDIR is set it does pick up that version.

Andreas

-- 
If your life was a horse, you'd have to shoot it.

_______________________________________________
PyKDE mailing list    [email protected]
http://mats.imk.fraunhofer.de/mailman/listinfo/pykde

Reply via email to