On Monday 22 May 2006 9:48 pm, Andreas Pakulat wrote: > On 22.05.06 12:16:03, Patrick Stinson wrote: > > yeah, this is TrollTech's problem. I find it hard to imagine that a > > stitch like -no-qt3support is broken in this ehemm...bugfix release. > > Well, this is just an "oversight", however it's one with a rather large > impact. There are other "oversights" found in Qt4.1, but not all of them > have such an impact. > > The problem for TT here is that adding the necessary macro here would > break either forward or backward binary compatibility.
Would it? It's not virtual. > However, using the 0519 snapshot of PyQt4 I can happily compile and > install with a Qt4 built with -no-qt3support (i.e. no printRange symbol > in libQtGui). I can't see wether Phil added anything (I don't know sip > to well)... I haven't done anything so I would expect it to be still broken. Phil _______________________________________________ PyKDE mailing list [email protected] http://mats.imk.fraunhofer.de/mailman/listinfo/pykde
